Empty Signifiers in Franz Kafka’s The Castle


The Criterion

The Criterion: An International Journal in English
Volume 17, Issue 2 · April 2026 · ISSN 0976-8165

Open Access
CC BY 4.0
Crossref DOI


Empty Signifiers in Franz Kafka’s The Castle


Swagato Chakraborty

World Literature
Pages 297–313
Article #18
2026V17N2052

DOI

Digital Object Identifier

10.66376/criterion.v17.n2.18

Registered with Crossref · Open Access · CC BY 4.0

Abstract

This paper aims to show that Franz Kafka, in his 1926 unfinished novel The Castle, has portrayed empty signifiers. The paper first explores the understanding of the empty signifier, tracing how it evolved from the idea of the instability of a sign in Saussure’s linguistic theories, and what it implies. Going forward, the paper uses this exploration to identify and analyse Kafka’s use of empty signifiers in the novel. Doing so, it identifies four (out of many other) empty signifiers. It analyses two characters with fluctuating significations – Frieda and Barnabas – and two objects which break the stability of their supposed meaning – telephones and letters. The paper concludes by noting that the portrayal of empty signifiers does not translate into obfuscation of subtexts. Ultimately, this paper is an attempt to bring the discourse on Kafka away from ultracrepidarian pronouncements of existentialism, and to centre it back on actual, critical and complex engagements with his works.

Keywords
Empty signifierssignmeaningsignification

Cite This Article — MLA 9th Edition

Swagato Chakraborty. “Empty Signifiers in Franz Kafka’s The Castle.” The Criterion: An International Journal in English, vol. 17, no. 2, Apr. 2026, pp. 297–313. DOI, https://doi.org/10.66376/criterion.v17.n2.18.

Article History
Received
3/10/2026/2026
Accepted
14 Apr 2026
Published Online
30 Apr 2026

Journal
The Criterion: An International Journal in English
Volume / Issue
Vol. 17, No. 2 (April 2026)
Pages
297–313
Article ID
2026V17N2052
ISSN
0976-8165

Open Access
CC BY 4.0
Crossref DOI

Open Access · CC BY 4.0 · Crossref DOI ·
the-criterion.com

Scroll to Top