A Tale of Two Kings: Arthur and Vikramāditya


The Criterion

The Criterion: An International Journal in English
Volume 17, Issue 2 · April 2026 · ISSN 0976-8165

Open Access
CC BY 4.0
Crossref DOI


A Tale of Two Kings: Arthur and Vikramāditya


Ragini Mishra

Comparative Literature
Pages 1031–1041
Article #65
2026V17N2151

DOI

Digital Object Identifier

10.66376/criterion.v17.n2.65

Registered with Crossref · Open Access · CC BY 4.0

Abstract

The legends of brave and chivalrous kings dominate medieval literature. However, only a few could achieve the timeless appeal and popularity of King Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table. Similarly, in the Indian tradition, the legendary King Vikramāditya (Vikram) is hailed as the epitome of an ideal emperor. Franklin Edgerton, in his introduction to the Harvard Oriental Series of Vikram’s Adventures or Thirty-Two Tales of the Throne, describes Vikram as one of the most prominent semi-historical or quasi-historical heroes of medieval India. He further observes that, "the stories all deal with the wonderful character and deeds of Vikrama, who is intended to serve as a kind of Hindu King Arthur, a model for real kings to follow." The comparison between Vikramāditya and Arthur suggests a shared archetype of the righteous and heroic monarch across cultures. In this paper, the author analyses the similarities between the Arthurian legends and the Vikram-Vetāl folktales.

Keywords
Arthurian LegendsVikramādityaFolkloreMedieval Literature

Cite This Article — MLA 9th Edition

Ragini Mishra. “A Tale of Two Kings: Arthur and Vikramāditya.” The Criterion: An International Journal in English, vol. 17, no. 2, Apr. 2026, pp. 1031–1041. DOI, https://doi.org/10.66376/criterion.v17.n2.65.

Article History
Received
4/8/2026/2026
Accepted
22 Apr 2026
Published Online
30 Apr 2026

Journal
The Criterion: An International Journal in English
Volume / Issue
Vol. 17, No. 2 (April 2026)
Pages
1031–1041
Article ID
2026V17N2151
ISSN
0976-8165

Open Access
CC BY 4.0
Crossref DOI

Open Access · CC BY 4.0 · Crossref DOI ·
the-criterion.com

Scroll to Top