Colonial/Postcolonial: Re-contesting the Imperial Baggage and A Critical Study of the Rhetoric of Domination and Control

The Criterion

The Criterion: An International Journal in English
Volume 17, Issue 5 · October 2026 · ISSN 0976-8165

Open Access CC BY 4.0 Crossref DOI

Colonial/Postcolonial: Re-contesting the Imperial Baggage and A Critical Study of the Rhetoric of Domination and Control

Dr. Abdul Mubid IslamORCID iD icon

Postcolonial Literature & Studies Pages 567–592 Article #32 2026V17N5104

DOI Digital Object Identifier

https://doi.org/10.66376/criterion.v17.n5.32

Registered with Crossref · Open Access · CC BY 4.0

ORCID iD
Abstract

Colonialism and Imperialism, two terminologies that although closely related, are not identical forms of domination. These terms involve the control of one group of people by another, yet their historical validation and connotations differ considerably (Kohn and Reddy “Colonialism,” sec. 1). Colonialism commonly refers to the movement of settlers into a foreign territory where they establish durable communities while remaining politically tied to the metropolitan power. Imperialism, by contrast, describes a broader structure of command through which one state exercises authority over another, whether by direct rule, settlement, economic pressure, or indirect political influence. This paper examines the relationship between colonialism, Imperialism, and the condition of postcoloniality by tracing the terminologies through which domination has been defended, normalised, and even critically challenged and debated. It argues that colonial power cannot be reduced to mere military conquests or economic exploitation. The idea of an empire stamps its authority through language most notably through claims of civilisation, progress, rationality, improvement, and empirical knowledge. Such ideas make domination appear natural, necessary, or even beneficial, while obscuring the subtext of violence and dispossession through which colonial rule thrives. The paper first clarifies the distinction between colonialism and Imperialism, while acknowledging their historical entanglement. It then considers how imperial authority persists beyond the end of formal rule, particularly through the organisation of knowledge, historical time, and cultural value. By treating colonialism as both a political practice and a system of meaning, the paper shows that postcolonial critique addresses not only the inherited institutions and economic inequalities but also lay bare the deeper assumptions that continue to shape what counts as reason, development, and civilisation.

Keywords
colonialismpostcolonialismdiscourseMarxismSubaltern Studiesknowledge and power

Cite This Article — MLA 9th Edition

Islam, Abdul Mubid. “Colonial/Postcolonial: Re-contesting the Imperial Baggage and A Critical Study of the Rhetoric of Domination and Control.” The Criterion: An International Journal in English, vol. 17, no. 5, Oct. 2026, pp. 567-92, https://doi.org/10.66376/criterion.v17.n5.32.

Article History
Received
29 Sep 2026
Revised
8 Oct 2026
Accepted
15 Oct 2026
Published Online
31 Oct 2026

Journal
The Criterion: An International Journal in English
Volume / Issue
Vol. 17, No. 5 (October 2026)
Pages
567–592
Article ID
2026V17N5104
ISSN
0976-8165

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by the Research Centre for English Language and Literature (RCELL) under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.

Open Access CC BY 4.0 Crossref DOI

← Back to Vol. 17, Issue 5 · Open Access · CC BY 4.0 · the-criterion.com

RCELL International Conference 2027 · Literature in the Age of AI · 13–14 February 2027 · Online · Call for Papers →
Scroll to Top
RCELL International Conference 2027 Literature in the Age of AI · 13–14 February 2027 · Online · Call for Papers →