Public Health Measures and Human Rights in Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year

The Criterion

The Criterion: An International Journal in English
Volume 17, Issue 5 · October 2026 · ISSN 0976-8165

Open Access CC BY 4.0 Crossref DOI

Public Health Measures and Human Rights in Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year

Dr. Mamta SinghORCID iD icon

Interdisciplinary / Other Pages 38–54 Article #4 2026V17N5008

DOI Digital Object Identifier

https://doi.org/10.66376/criterion.v17.n5.4

Registered with Crossref · Open Access · CC BY 4.0

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between public health measures and human rights in Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year (1722). It analyses how the narrative depicts the plague not only as a medical emergency but also as a social experience regulated by public health measures such as quarantine, surveillance, restrictions on movement, and the shutting up of infected houses. While the government introduces these measures to control the spread of the plague, they result in separation from family members, trauma, loss of livelihood, displacement, and social inequality among the people. The study explores how these measures affect people’s basic human rights at the social, psychological, and economic levels in 17th-century England.

The paper also uses Michel Foucault’s idea of biopolitics to examine how the government controls people’s movement and affects social behaviour, mental health, and economic activities during the plague. The study shows that the authorities often confine healthy people with infected family members, restrict burial practices, and closely monitor public movement during the plague. The paper further examines how poor people suffer more because they lack food, medical care, employment, and shelter during the outbreak. These actions limit personal freedom and affect the dignity and rights of individuals. The paper also connects the experiences described in the novel with the COVID-19 pandemic, when governments across the world imposed lockdowns, quarantine, and restrictions on movement to control the spread of the disease. The study concludes that Defoe’s narrative shows how public health measures can protect society during a pandemic but can also interfere with basic human rights. It encourages governments to adopt more humane and balanced responses to public health emergencies.

Keywords
Quarantinesurveillancebiopoliticstraumadisplacementsocial inequality

Cite This Article — MLA 9th Edition

Singh, Mamta. “Public Health Measures and Human Rights in Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year.” The Criterion: An International Journal in English, vol. 17, no. 5, Oct. 2026, pp. 38-54, https://doi.org/10.66376/criterion.v17.n5.4.

Article History
Received
6 Aug 2026
Revised
4 Oct 2026
Accepted
9 Oct 2026
Published Online
31 Oct 2026

Journal
The Criterion: An International Journal in English
Volume / Issue
Vol. 17, No. 5 (October 2026)
Pages
38–54
Article ID
2026V17N5008
ISSN
0976-8165

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by the Research Centre for English Language and Literature (RCELL) under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.

Open Access CC BY 4.0 Crossref DOI

← Back to Vol. 17, Issue 5 · Open Access · CC BY 4.0 · the-criterion.com

RCELL International Conference 2027 · Literature in the Age of AI · 13–14 February 2027 · Online · Call for Papers →
Scroll to Top
RCELL International Conference 2027 Literature in the Age of AI · 13–14 February 2027 · Online · Call for Papers →